Skip to content

docs: add LFX Insights badges #26722

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2025
Merged

docs: add LFX Insights badges #26722

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 19, 2025

Conversation

castrojo
Copy link
Contributor

@castrojo castrojo commented Jul 31, 2025 •
edited by Luap99
Loading

This adds the LFX Health score and 2 contributor badges to the README. Nice work on scoring an excellent!

LFX Health Score
LFX Contributors
LFX Active Contributors

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

@castrojo
docs: add LFX Insights badges
e33d92c 
This adds the LFX Health score and 2 contributor badges to the README. Nice work on scoring an excellent! 

Signed-off-by: Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None label Jul 31, 2025
Luap99
Luap99 reviewed Jul 31, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't mind bages but Active Contributors (1y) shows the same 12k value as all times contributors? That cannot be possibly right?

This shows 2,545 contributors for the past year:
https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/project/containers-podman/contributors?timeRange=past365days&start=2024-07-31&end=2025-07-31

@castrojo
Copy link
Contributor Author

castrojo commented Aug 6, 2025

I'll report the discrepancies to the LFX team, thanks!

@castrojo
fix: drop yearly contributor badge
2959d9f 
At least the other two work properly. 😄 

Signed-off-by: Jorge O. Castro <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None labels Aug 19, 2025
Luap99
Luap99 approved these changes Aug 19, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, @mheon PTAL

@openshift-ci OpenShift CI
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: castrojo, Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 19, 2025
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Aug 19, 2025

Sure
/lgtm
Reminds me, I need to update release notes on main to reflect the 5.6 release

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d63ed5d into containers:main Aug 19, 2025
36 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Luap99 Luap99 Luap99 approved these changes

Assignees

@mheon mheon

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@castrojo @mheon @Luap99